Keep systematic training system design efficient!

Systematic methods for training system design have been available for years. Using such methods for the development of user requirements and specifications for technically advanced training means (simulators, E-learning, CBT, etc.) ensures that these will fulfil the training needs. The problem is that applying systematic methods takes time and effort, and requires expertise. Our itators. The same systematic method for training system design can be used at different moments with different levels of detail. The SLIM method has been designed for the needs statement phase. In this early stage training needs analysis and training program design are done at a rather global level. Later on, using the same or a similar step-by-step method, the results can be elaborated in more detail, in order to write specifications and -eventually- to implement training. The SLIM method emphasises aspects that are often not systematically addressed: the place of training means in overall training, the choice between high and lower fidelity options, facilities for instruction, feedback and assessment, and the role of the instructors. Inviting all stakeholders ensures that the chosen solution is widely supported. In this paper we briefly describe the SLIM method, and the experiences during its application in a number of different cases. We conclude that needs statements can be developatements can be developifferent cases. We conclude that needs statements can be developed quickly and systematically using the SLIM method in workshop setting.