Perception of signals presented in the periphery of the visual field

article
Two experiments were performed which tested the type of information that can be extracted from the periphery of the visual field, i.e. content information or position information. In both studies two digits were compared, one presented at the left and one at the right of the subject's meridian, seperated by a binocular visual angle, comprising either an eye-field (45??) or a head-field display (100??). In the first experiment the right signal was presented in separate blocks of either degraded or undegraded digits. In the case of undegraded digits, processing efficiency was better in the eye-field than in the head-field. With degraded digits this eye-field advantage was significantly smaller, but did not altogether disappear, suggesting that information about both the content and the position of digits in the periphery is acquired in the eye-field as opposed to the head-field. In the second experiment degraded and undegraded digits occured randomly within the same block of trials. This was done to investigate whether peripheral information is acquired automatically or through controlled processing. The results indicate a small eye-field advantage, about equal for both degraded and undegraded digits. This supports the controlled processing hypothesis, at least with regard to the acquisition of content information from the periphery. ?? 1984.
TNO Identifier
229611
ISSN
0001-6918
Source
Acta Psychologica, 55(2), pp. 143-155.
Pages
143-155
Files
To receive the publication files, please send an e-mail request to TNO Repository.