Employing use-cases for piecewise evaluation of requirements and claims
conference paper
Motivation – Complex design specifications must be partitioned in manageable pieces to be able to evaluate them in separate experiments. No methodology exists yet to deal with this task.
Research approach – Practical experience in Situated Cognitive Engineering and the Mission Execution Crew Assistant is combined with a theoretical perspective on the relation between use-cases, requirements and claims.
Findings/design – Hierarchical clustering is an effective method for partitioning a design specification.
Use-cases provide a good criterion based on which to cluster the requirements and claims.
Originality/Value – A new method and tool are presented for organising requirements and for systematising the evaluation of a complex design
specification.
Take away message – Piecewise evaluation benefits from a use-case-based partitioning of the design specification combined with an experimental stance on requirements and claims.
Research approach – Practical experience in Situated Cognitive Engineering and the Mission Execution Crew Assistant is combined with a theoretical perspective on the relation between use-cases, requirements and claims.
Findings/design – Hierarchical clustering is an effective method for partitioning a design specification.
Use-cases provide a good criterion based on which to cluster the requirements and claims.
Originality/Value – A new method and tool are presented for organising requirements and for systematising the evaluation of a complex design
specification.
Take away message – Piecewise evaluation benefits from a use-case-based partitioning of the design specification combined with an experimental stance on requirements and claims.
Topics
TNO Identifier
427396
Source title
European conference on cognitive ergonomics 2010 (ECCE2010)
Files
To receive the publication files, please send an e-mail request to TNO Repository.