Randomised clinical trial on the effect of the Dutch obstetric peer review system
article
The project 'Obstetric Peer Review Interventions' (Verloskundige Onderlinge Kwaliteitsspiegeling Interventies, VOKSINT) was set-up in The Netherlands in 1994. It provided annual comparison data (quality ranking, league tables) for secondary care obstetric departments adjusted for population differences, based on the data registered in the Perinatal Database of The Netherlands (Landelijke Verloskunde Registratie, LVR). The aim of the so called VOKS reports was to influence obstetricians' interventions in such a way that they led to a more homogeneous policy. To assess this influence, a trial was set-up, with departments randomly assigned to be or not to be informed about the VOKS results.Obstetric intervention rates and the morbidity of newborns including neonatal neurological examinations (NNEs) were assessed.Obstetric intervention rates were similar in the report group and the control group. Practice in the report group became more homogeneous (adjusted for population differences) than in the control departments, but this was only statistically significant for term caesarean section. Copyright © 2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd.
Topics
League tablesNeurologic conditionObstetric interventionsOutcome measuresPeer reviewQuality managementReport systemClinical trialControlled clinical trialControlled studyHealth care policyHealth care qualityMedical practiceNetherlandsNeurologic examinationNewborn morbidityObstetric careOutcomes researchQuality controlRandomized controlled trialTypes of studyCesarean SectionDatabasesDelivery, ObstetricFemaleGestational AgeHospitalsHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureLabor, InducedNetherlandsObstetricsPeer ReviewPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsQuality of Health Care
TNO Identifier
236515
ISSN
03012115
Source
European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 102(1), pp. 21-30.
Pages
21-30
Files
To receive the publication files, please send an e-mail request to TNO Repository.