Searched for: subject:"MTDP"
(1 - 4 of 4)
document
Bijl, P. (author), Hogervorst, M.A. (author)
The MRTD and MRC end-to-end EO/IR system tests and corresponding models, described in NATO STANAGs 4347-4351, lead to incorrect Target Acquisition (TA) range predictions for modern imaging systems that are 1) usually under-sampled and/or 2) contain complex signal processing. Considerable efforts have been made to develop tests and models that...
conference paper 2012
document
Bijl, P. (author), Hogervorst, M.A. (author), TNO Defensie en Veiligheid (author)
Currently, three major approaches exist to predict Target Acquisition (TA) performance with thermal imagers: i) the TOD laboratory method and model, ii) the NVThermIP model and iii) the MTDP lab method and TRM3 model. In this study, TOD measurements, TOD predictions and NVThermIP predictions are compared for a number of simulated sensors ranging...
conference paper 2007
document
TNO Technische Menskunde (author), Bijl, P. (author), Hogervorst, M.A. (author), Valeton, J.M. (author)
At the moment there are three potential models and associated measures to replace the FLIR92 model and the MRTD as the standard for sensor performance characterization and TA range predictions. These are: 1) the NVTherm model that calculates the MRTD-ID, 2) the TRM3 model that calculates the MTDP and 3) the TOD model that calculates the TOD. The...
conference paper 2002
document
TNO Technische Menskunde (author), Bijl, P. (author), Valeton, J.M. (author), Hogervorst, M.A. (author)
The traditional test pattern for end-to-end EO system performance testing in the laboratory has been the static 3- or 4-bar target. This choice was governed by linear systems approach. The introduction of under-sampled imagers such as IRFPAs (infrared focal plane array cameras) has challenged the testing community to develop an alternative test,...
conference paper 2001
Searched for: subject:"MTDP"
(1 - 4 of 4)