Title
Introduction: Mass screening, health technology assessment, and health policy in some European countries
Author
TNO Arbeid
Oortwijn, W.
David Banta, H.
Cranovsky, R.
Publication year
2001
Abstract
Objective: The series of papers in this issue was developed to examine the use of health technology assessment in policies toward prevention - specifically toward mass screening - in European countries. The papers actually examined three screening strategies: mammography screening for breast cancer, prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer, and routine ultrasound in normal pregnancy. Methods: Papers were sought from the member states of the European Union, plus Switzerland. Ultimately, nine acceptable papers were received, and were reviewed, revised, and edited. Results: Screening is an accepted strategy in many countries for reducing the burden of disease through early detection and intervention. In part, this is because of successful screening programs that have been evaluated and implemented in many countries. At the same time, unevaluated and even useless and harmful screening programs - unjustified medically or economically - are widespread. Health technology assessment could help assure that only effective and cost-effective screening programs are implemented. Conclusion: The main conclusion is that screening is an important preventive strategy. Any screening program, however, should be carefully assessed before implementation.
Subject
Health policy
Health technology assessment
Screening
prostate specific antigen
biomedical technology assessment
breast cancer
cost effectiveness analysis
health care policy
health program
mammography
mass screening
pregnancy
primary prevention
prostate cancer
review
ultrasound
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Europe
Humans
Mass Screening
Technology Assessment, Biomedical
To reference this document use:
http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:203d68be-3c4c-4605-9b47-d4a525189eab
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s026646230110601x
TNO identifier
280352
ISSN
0266-4623
Source
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 17 (17), 269-274
Document type
article