Title
Evaluation of 280 000 cases in Dutch midwifery practices: A descriptive study
Author
Amelink-Verburg, M.P.
Verloove-Vanhorick, S.P.
Hakkenberg, R.M.A.
Veldhuijzen, I.M.E.
Bennebroek Gravenhorst, J.
Buitendijk, S.E.
TNO Kwaliteit van Leven
Publication year
2008
Abstract
Objective: To assess the nature and outcome of intrapartum referrals from primary to secondary care within the Dutch obstetric system. Design: Descriptive study. Setting: Dutch midwifery database (LVR1), covering 95% of all midwifery care and 80% of all Dutch pregnancies (2001-03). Population: Low-risk women (280 097) under exclusive care of a primary level midwife at the start of labour either with intention to deliver at home or with a personal preference to deliver in hospital under care of a primary level midwife. Methods: Women were classified into three categories (no referral, urgent referral and referral without urgency) and were related to maternal characteristics and to neonatal outcomes. Main outcome measures: Distribution of referral categories, main reasons for urgent referral, Apgar score at 5 minutes, perinatal death within 24 hours and referral to a paediatrician within 24 hours. Results: In our study, 68.1% of the women completed childbirth under exclusive care of a midwife, 3.6% were referred on an urgency basis and 28.3% were referred without urgency. Of all referrals, 11.2% were on an urgency basis. The main reasons for urgent referrals were fetal distress and postpartum haemorrhage. The nonurgent referrals predominantly took place during the first stage of labour (73.6% of all referrals). Women who had planned a home delivery were referred less frequently than women who had planned a hospital delivery: 29.3 and 37.2%, respectively (P < 0.001).On average, the mean Apgar score at 5 minutes was high (9.72%) and the peripartum neonatal mortality was low (0.05%) in the total study group. No maternal deaths occurred. Adverse neonatal outcomes occurred most frequently in the urgent referral group, followed by the group of referrals without urgency and the nonreferred group. Conclusions: Risk selection is a crucial element of the Dutch obstetric system and continues into the postpartum period. The system results in a relatively small percentage of intrapartum urgent referrals and in overall satisfactory neonatal outcomes in deliveries led by primary level midwives. © 2008 The Authors.
PZ,V&P.WI (wetenschappelijk Internationaal)
Subject
Health
Neonatal outcome
Perinatal registry
Planned home birth
Childbirth
Controlled study
Delivery
Fetus distress
Intrapartum care
Medical practice
Midwife
Outcome assessment
Perinatal death
Postpartum hemorrhage
Female
Home Childbirth
Hospitalization
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Midwifery
Netherlands
Obstetric Labor Complications
Perinatal Care
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Outcome
Prenatal Care
Primary Health Care
Professional Practice
Program Evaluation
Referral and Consultation
To reference this document use:
http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:593174d2-bb50-404b-b880-9b3ed51b55af
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01580.x
TNO identifier
240726
ISSN
1470-0328
Source
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 115 (5), 570-578
Document type
article